Sunday, November 10, 2013

"Neither can live while the other survives"


This week we read a piece titled, "There is No Unmarked Woman" by Deborah Tannen. In her piece, Tannen uses personal anecdotes, such as the one in the business meeting, where she explains how she immediately begins to judge the other women around her based on how they dressed, how they did their make up, and how they styled their hair. She then contrasted her view on the women with how she viewed the men in the room; Tannen did not have much to judge when she looked at the men, because, besides the color variation, they basically all wore the same suit and tie and dress shoes. To further her claim that no woman is unmarked, Tannen continues to provide sturdy examples of markings such as titles (Miss, Ms., Mrs. Dr., etc...) or word endings (actor, actress, etc...). While reading this piece, I could clearly see how clothing marked woman, as there are so many different styles and ways to pair clothing together, but I never thought of how our titles could mark us. Tannen's piece really opened up my eyes to the many ways women are marked, and it made me sad that women are still treated and thought of in this manner. As much as I try to, I have yet to think of a solution for this problem. Our society has become so focused on self-expression, which is good, but that is a major cause of our markings. The way we choose to express ourselves will determine the way others judge us. It would be very difficult to solve the problem of being marked, without taking away self-expression.

3 comments:

  1. Wow I completely agree with this post. It's hard when society tells you to "express yourself" and when people tell you to "be yourself" when you'll get judged for doing so. So in reality society is very hypocritical. Tannen's piece also opened my eyes up too. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice May! I agree it's hard to think of a fix for this problem. The problem lies in what makes us unique, so how do we eliminate the problem without taking away what makes each and every one of us special?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also agree with every aspect of Tannen's writing! It's funny how the title 'Miss' is a shortened form of 'Mistress' which now has a rather negative connotation (wink, wink, nudge, nudge). I was reading the blog surisburnbook.tumblr.com today and she jokingly mentioned that 'boys' fashion' is an oxymoron. Which I totally agreed with! It's funny how at a party girls are dressed in new tops, with hours worth of hair and makeup, likely hundreds of dollars worth of products-and boys...aren't. They can roll off the couch, shower, and wear something that smells nice and fits-and they're good to go.

    ReplyDelete