This week we read a piece titled, "There is No
Unmarked Woman" by Deborah Tannen. In her piece, Tannen uses personal
anecdotes, such as the one in the business meeting, where she explains how she
immediately begins to judge the other women around her based on how they
dressed, how they did their make up, and how they styled their hair. She then
contrasted her view on the women with how she viewed the men in the room;
Tannen did not have much to judge when she looked at the men, because, besides
the color variation, they basically all wore the same suit and tie and dress
shoes. To further her claim that no woman is unmarked, Tannen continues to
provide sturdy examples of markings such as titles (Miss, Ms., Mrs. Dr.,
etc...) or word endings (actor, actress, etc...). While reading this piece, I
could clearly see how clothing marked woman, as there are so many different
styles and ways to pair clothing together, but I never thought of how our
titles could mark us. Tannen's piece really opened up my eyes to the many ways
women are marked, and it made me sad that women are still treated and thought
of in this manner. As much as I try to, I have yet to think of a solution for
this problem. Our society has become so focused on self-expression, which is
good, but that is a major cause of our markings. The way we choose to express
ourselves will determine the way others judge us. It would be very difficult to
solve the problem of being marked, without taking away self-expression.
Wow I completely agree with this post. It's hard when society tells you to "express yourself" and when people tell you to "be yourself" when you'll get judged for doing so. So in reality society is very hypocritical. Tannen's piece also opened my eyes up too. Great post!
ReplyDeleteNice May! I agree it's hard to think of a fix for this problem. The problem lies in what makes us unique, so how do we eliminate the problem without taking away what makes each and every one of us special?
ReplyDeleteI also agree with every aspect of Tannen's writing! It's funny how the title 'Miss' is a shortened form of 'Mistress' which now has a rather negative connotation (wink, wink, nudge, nudge). I was reading the blog surisburnbook.tumblr.com today and she jokingly mentioned that 'boys' fashion' is an oxymoron. Which I totally agreed with! It's funny how at a party girls are dressed in new tops, with hours worth of hair and makeup, likely hundreds of dollars worth of products-and boys...aren't. They can roll off the couch, shower, and wear something that smells nice and fits-and they're good to go.
ReplyDelete